🇧🇷 Brazil Episodes

Congress inflicted a crushing defeat on the Lula government on Wednesday night (25th), overturning the IOF decree. It was the first time since 1992 that parliamentarians had overturned a presidential decree. Government ministers are divided on whether or not to take the case to the STF – the opposition says that if it appeals to the Supreme Court, the government will amplify the crisis in Brasília. With the fall of the decree, Congress stopped the government's idea of raising R$ 10 billion more and, with that, getting closer to reaching the fiscal target. The impact of the political battle, therefore, has serious fiscal consequences. Economists warn that the Brazilian State runs the risk of becoming paralyzed in 2026 if public accounts are not balanced. To explain the seriousness of the situation in Brasília, Natuza Nery receives Flávia Oliveira. “It was more than a steamroller. It was a road roller,” summarizes the GloboNews commentator, columnist for the newspaper O Globo and CBN radio. For her, more than a defeat for the government, what is happening in Brasília is “a defeat for the country. It is a Congress that has acted and voted for its own benefit”. Afterwards, Natuza Nery speaks with political scientist and sociologist Sérgio Abranches. Creator of the term “coalition presidentialism”, in the late 1980s, Sérgio assesses the current political moment. “The system of government is dysfunctional. It is a Congress that does not represent. And an Executive that can no longer govern,” he says.

Almost 5 days after falling about 200 meters inside the crater of a volcano in Indonesia, the body of the 26-year-old Brazilian woman was rescued this Wednesday (26). Her body was found by volunteer rescuers, 600 meters from the trail she was taking towards the top of Mount Rinjani. Juliana Marins' family says that, before the accident, she was left alone by the group's guide – the alert to the authorities was sent only 5 hours later. Juliana's family accuses the Indonesian authorities of negligence. To explain the particularities of the mountain and point out possible errors that may have led to the Brazilian woman's death, Natuza Nery listens to Carlos Santalena, climber and expedition guide. Carlos, who has climbed Mount Everest four times and climbed Rinjani in 2015, reports on what it is like to climb the mountain Juliana was on and talks about the signs that there was negligence in the rescue. Afterwards, Natuza listens to Silvio Neto, president of the Brazilian Association of Mountain Guides. He talks about how guides should be trained for adventure tourism, the type of information people need to have to practice climbing activities safely.

This Tuesday (24), Mauro Cid and Braga Netto sat face to face in a room at the Supreme Federal Court. Defendants in the coup d'état attempt case, the former aide-de-camp and the former Minister of Defense and Chief of Staff of Jair Bolsonaro gave their versions of the same accusation: a conspiratorial meeting at Braga Netto's house and an amount that would have financed the coup-plotting criminal organization. When confronted, both maintained their previous statements. After them, it was former minister Anderson Torres' turn to sit face to face with former Army commander Freire Gomes, a witness in the case. In this episode, Natuza Nery receives Fernando Abrucio to explain how the confrontation affects the process. Professor at FGV, commentator at GloboNews and columnist for the Valor Econômico newspaper, Abrucio recalls the role of Mauro Cid, Braga Netto and Anderson Torres in the coup plot and analyzes the versions presented by the defendants. He also assesses how the defendants' and the former president's entourage are moving to prevent or reverse a likely conviction in the Supreme Court.

In 2022, Russia attacked and invaded Ukraine under the pretext of defending itself against possible Ukrainian threats. The following year, the terrorist group Hamas' attack left a trail of death and violence in Israel; the Israeli response in the Gaza Strip promoted a humanitarian crisis that accounts for at least 55,000 deaths. Less than two weeks ago, the Iranian nuclear program served as a pretext for air strikes by Israel and then the United States. Faced with a world map taken by burning points, something in common: the primacy of the use of weapons over dialogue. Bellicism is also present in the organization of world trade, where the effects of the tariff announced by Donald Trump are still uncertain. In an interview with GloboNews, Celso Amorim, former chancellor and special advisor to the Presidency for international affairs, spoke of "demoralization of the international system" and an "attack on the world order". For historian and career diplomat Rubens Ricupero, who was Brazil's ambassador to Washington, Rome and the United Nations, it is "a moment of weakening of diplomatic resources". In this episode, Rubens Ricupero, who was also under-secretary general of the UN (1995 to 2004) and is now an emeritus advisor to the Brazilian Center for International Relations, is interviewed by Natuza Nery. He analyzes the crisis in world diplomacy and explains why the classic instruments in relations between countries are losing ground at a moment in history marked by unilateral decisions and wars. "I do not see the case of Iran as capable of provoking a nuclear and world war," he says.

It was early Sunday morning in Iran when the US launched an offensive against three Iranian nuclear facilities. After days of suspense over whether or not to enter the conflict between Israel and the Tehran regime, Donald Trump announced that the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan facilities had been targeted by American airstrikes. In response, the Iranian parliament approved closing the Strait of Hormuz, responsible for 20% of the world's oil route. In the first part of this episode of O Assunto, Natuza Nery talks to Oliver Stuenkel to analyze the immediate consequences of the US entering the war. Oliver, who is a professor of International Relations at FGV and a researcher at Harvard and the Carnegie Endowment, answers what risks Trump subjected himself to by attacking Iran, and Tehran's possible responses. He also assesses the likely economic effects if the closure of the Strait of Hormuz materializes. Afterwards, Natuza receives Samy Adghirni, a Bloomberg journalist based in Paris who was a correspondent in Iran from 2011 to 2014. Author of the book "The Iranians," Samy traces the richness of Persian history and the reasons why Iranians are so proud of their culture: "Iran is more than a country, it is a civilization." He also presents an overview of the country's current contradictions: a modern society that coexists with a theocratic, oppressive, and violent regime – especially towards women. "The current situation in the Middle East shows the increasing weakness of this regime," he concludes.

Instability is permanent and spreads across territories. In Gaza, a war exceeding 600 days causes an unprecedented humanitarian crisis. In Lebanon, the population lives under attacks from Hezbollah and the Israeli army. In Syria, the end of a long dictatorship led to a fragmented country. In Yemen, Houthi rebels are also involved in conflicts. Now, since the beginning of the exchange of bombings between Israel and Iran, tension has escalated to the imminence of a total war between the region's two most powerful military countries -- a risk that grows with signals from Donald Trump that the US may enter the conflict. In this episode, Natuza Nery talks to Guga Chacra to explain the origins of these instabilities. The commentator from Globo, GloboNews, CBN, and columnist for O Globo recounts the history of failed peace negotiations of recent decades, analyzes current points of greatest tension, and tries to answer the question: what to do to pacify the Middle East?

Assim que os primeiros bombardeios israelenses atingiram o território iraniano, o secretário de Estado dos EUA se apressou em negar a participação americana no ataque. O presidente Donald Trump também se apresentou para defender uma solução diplomática e disse que estava perto de um acordo para o programa nuclear do Irã. Menos de uma semana depois, tudo mudou. Primeiro, Trump subiu o tom num ultimato contra o Irã, exigindo que o regime desista totalmente de seu programa nuclear. Depois, foi ainda mais longe. O presidente americano falou como se os próprios EUA já estivessem dentro da guerra, afirmou ter controle total e completo dos céus iranianos e ameaçou: “Não vamos matar o Líder Supremo [o aiatolá Ali Khamenei, chefe de Estado do Irã]. Por enquanto”. Para explicar o que quer Donald Trump com esse vaivém e quais são os objetivos americanos no conflito, Natuza Nery entrevista Fernando Brancoli, professor de Segurança Internacional e de Geopolítica da UFRJ. Fernando analisa também quais as consequências de uma eventual entrada americana na guerra: “Se a gente olha as invasões americanas no Oriente Médio, o que acontece é uma guerra assimétrica com morte de civis e destruição de infraestrutura”.

"Don't escalate the conflict. End the conflict." That's how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded when asked about Israel's plans to eliminate Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Netanyahu's statement was given on Monday (16th), the fourth day of mutual attacks between the two countries. And a day after the US press reported that President Donald Trump vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Khamenei. On the Iranian side, an official statement promises to destroy Israel's infrastructure and threatens: residents who want to stay alive should leave Israeli territory. To explain the status of the conflict - which enters its fifth day this Tuesday (17th) - Julia Duailibi talks to Andrew Traumann, professor of International Relations at the Curitiba University Center. Organizer of the book "Islamic Republic of Iran, 40 years", Andrew explains who Ali Khamenei is, how he rose to the position of Supreme Leader of the Iranian Republic and what the situation of the country's current government is. Andrew assesses where the Israeli strategy in Iran seems to be heading. Since the beginning of the attacks, at least 11 key figures of the regime, including military personnel from the Revolutionary Guard, commanders of Intelligence, the Armed Forces and representatives of diplomacy. He also concludes how the war weakens the ayatollahs and what the chances are of the Iranian regime collapsing.

Facing the Mediterranean Sea, over 50 heads of state and government gathered last week to discuss ocean protection actions. Brazil, with a maritime space occupying 5.7 million km², an area comparable to the Amazon, attended the UN Ocean Conference, hosted in Nice, France. In his speech, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva pledged to emphasize ocean conservation and sustainable use and increase marine protected area coverage from 26% to 30%, fulfilling the Global Biodiversity Framework target. Lula also criticized plastic use but excluded the country from an agreement called "Nice appeal," advocating for the gradual ban of single-use disposable plastic. The Conference also marked the premiere of the documentary "Quanto Vale o Azul" (How Much is the Blue Worth), by Ricardo Gomes, marine biologist and director of the Instituto Mar Urbano. He, who was in Nice and the other two Conferences, in Portugal (2022) and the USA (2017), tells what has changed since then. Afterwards, Natuza Nery receives Rodrigo Cebrian, co-founder of the Movimento EUceano.org and director and presenter of the series "Euceano," available on Globoplay. He explains the term "blue economy" and talks about ways to use marine resources sustainably.

It was early Friday morning, local time, when an Israeli offensive targeted the "heart of Iran's nuclear weapons program." Israeli bombings hit at least three nuclear facilities and killed military leaders and scientists. Israeli forces claim the operation aimed to halt the advancement of the Iranian nuclear program. Less than 24 hours later, the Iranian counterattack began: the cities of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem were targeted. The escalation of attacks between Israel and Iran reignites fears of a nuclear conflict, in addition to the risk of a widespread conflict in the Middle East. In this extra episode of O Assunto, Natuza Nery receives Tanguy Baghdadi and Hussein Kalout to explain the reasons that led to the Israeli attack, and what to expect from the Iranian response. Tanguy Baghdadi, professor of international politics and founder of the Petit Journal podcast, details the elements that led to the Israeli offensive at this moment: the political situation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the fall of important supporters of the Iranian regime, and the internal crisis in the Tehran government. He recalls that the Iranian nuclear program was encouraged by the US itself, back in the 1950s, and justifies why it is not in Iran's interest for the Americans to enter this war. "Now we have a one-on-one war," he says, speaking of the risks of the war spreading. Then, Hussein Kalout, political scientist and advisor to Cebri (Brazilian Center for International Relations), assesses that Iran is "cornered" for two reasons: regional isolation, after not responding to Israeli attacks against important allies, and the internal risk of seeing an uprising against the regime. Finally, he concludes what the US interests are in the conflict.

On Thursday (12th), STF Minister Alexandre de Moraes cast the seventh vote in favor of holding technology companies accountable for publishing illegal or criminal content. The day before, the Supreme Court had already formed a majority to change the interpretation of article 19 of the Brazilian Internet Civil Framework. Ministers Edson Fachin, Cármen Lúcia, and Nunes Marques still need to vote. The trial is scheduled to resume on June 25th. The Court is moving towards defining that a judicial decision is no longer necessary for platforms to remove illegal or criminal content – a rule in effect since 2014, when the Civil Framework was sanctioned and created the legal basis for internet use in Brazil. To understand what is at stake in the Supreme Court's discussion, Natuza Nery talks with Nuria López, technology partner at Daniel Advogados and PhD in Theory and Philosophy of Law from PUC de São Paulo. Nuria details what article 19 says and why it is being re-discussed now. She recalls the specific cases that led this discussion to the Supreme Court, including one involving the late Orkut. In the conversation, Núria explains the new models for regulating social networks, including the so-called 'notice and takedown', a mechanism by which networks become responsible for content from the moment they are notified.

Amidst protests against ICE arrests, Los Angeles' mayor decreed a curfew to contain violence after demonstrators blocked roads and burned vehicles near public buildings, met with police using tear gas and rubber bullets. Trump sent National Guard agents to California without the governor's request. Guga Chacra explains the political and personal clash: "Trump wants to transform the U.S. into an authoritarian regime. He knows he won't succeed entirely, but democracy is deteriorating." Felippe Coaglio discusses the importance of immigrants to Los Angeles and how ICE operates, noting the protests' spread and ICE's unusually truculent actions.

For two hours and 9 minutes, Jair Bolsonaro was questioned in the criminal action regarding the attempted coup d'état. Sitting face to face with Alexandre de Moraes, the former president denied the existence of a coup plan and admitted to having talked with military personnel about what he called "legal exits" for the election result. Bolsonaro said that "there was no climate" for a coup. And he denied having trimmed the so-called coup draft. The former president apologized to Moraes when questioned about having insinuated that Supreme Court ministers received bribes during the elections. He also denied having encouraged illegal demonstrations and called those who ask for a new AI-5 or a military intervention "crazy". To detail and analyze the political meanings of Jair Bolsonaro's questioning, Natuza Nery receives journalist Vera Magalhães, columnist for the newspaper O Globo, anchor at CBN radio and presenter of the Roda Viva program, from TV Cultura. Together, they evaluate the posture adopted by the former president in the Supreme Court: in the expected meeting with Alexandre de Moraes, there was even a climate of relaxation – Bolsonaro "invited" Moraes to be his candidate for vice president in 2026; the minister declined. Vera also answers in which moments Bolsonaro complicated himself and in which others presented contradictions. Afterwards, Natuza Nery receives Eloísa Machado, professor of Law at FGV-SP and coordinator of the research group Supremo em Pauta. Eloísa assesses the consequences of the deposition for Bolsonaro's legal future. For her, during the questioning in the Supreme Court, Bolsonaro defended himself, but also made a "soapbox", with affirmations directed towards his support base. She also explains the next steps of the action in the Supreme Federal Court.

For almost 4 hours, Mauro Cid sat face to face with Alexandre de Moraes on the first day of the testimonies of the 8 defendants in the trial about the attempted coup d'état. Also a defendant in the process, former president Jair Bolsonaro followed everything his former aide-de-camp said. Cid confirmed that Bolsonaro read and edited the so-called coup draft — a document that foresaw authoritarian measures to reverse the result of the 2022 elections. Cid placed General Braga Netto as a central figure in the coup plot. Before Moraes, Cid confirmed the accusation made by the PGR and declared that he had "witnessed a large part of the facts, but without participating directly in them." At various times, the lieutenant colonel said he did not remember details of meetings between the defendants in the case. In this episode, Natuza Nery receives Octávio Guedes. Together, they go through the main points of Mauro Cid's interrogation. GloboNews commentator and g1 columnist, Octávio analyzes whether Mauro Cid seems, even being a whistleblower, to preserve his former boss. And answers how the lieutenant colonel's statements complicate Bolsonaro and Braga Netto. He also concludes about how the questions asked by the former president's defense are part of a strategy to stamp "liar" on Mauro Cid's forehead.

The 2022 Census data on the religion of Brazilians, released last Friday (6th) by the IBGE, confirm a trend observed in recent decades: the growth of the evangelical population, which reached 26.9% - in the previous Census, of 2010, the rate was 21.6%. What surprised experts was the pace of this growth, less accelerated than expected. Catholicism remains the most popular religion among Brazilians. According to IGBE data, 56.6% claim to be Catholic: although still an absolute majority, it is the lowest percentage since the first survey on the topic conducted in Brazil, in 1872 - at the time, the rate was 99.7%. The Census also indicates that the proportion of Brazilians who declare themselves practitioners of Umbanda or Candomblé more than tripled (from 0.3% to 1%) and that the number of Spiritists fell (2.2% to 1.8%) from 2010 to the present. Brazilians with no declared religion are now 9.3%, a record in the historical series. To break down these numbers and explain what is behind the changes in the faith of Brazilians, Natuza Nery interviews Ana Carolina Evangelista, political scientist and executive director of Iser, the Institute for Religious Studies.

The US president and the richest man on the planet starred in a public spat for the whole world to see and read. First, Trump said he was disappointed with Musk, who in recent days has made a series of criticisms of the mega-budget bill that the US president wants to pass in Congress. The billionaire's response came via X: the businessman said that without his help, the Republican would not have been elected and threatened to cancel the public use of Space X rockets. Musk also endorsed a publication that called for Trump's impeachment. And, without presenting evidence, he linked the name of the US president to the sexual scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein – a businessman convicted of sex trafficking of minors who died in prison. On the other side, the US president threatened to cut subsidies and government contracts with Musk's companies. After the public discussion, the businessman's companies lost US$ 148 billion in value. In this episode, Natuza Nery receives Oliver Stuenkel, professor of international relations at FGV, researcher at Harvard and the Carnegie Endowment, in the USA. Oliver details the effects of each phase of the epic public discussion. "Musk runs the risk of destroying his own companies," assesses Oliver, citing the economic impacts of the fight. The professor also talks about the chances of an impeachment request against Trump prospering and the political effects for the American president.

For 14 days, STF minister Alexandre de Moraes questioned the 52 witnesses in the trial about the attempted coup d'état, investigated after the anti-democratic acts of January 8. The full transcript of what was said became public last Tuesday and reveals, in addition to what the witnesses said, the reaction of former president Jair Bolsonaro upon hearing the testimonies. Bolsonaro is one of the 8 defendants who, starting next week, will be questioned in the action of the coup plot that aimed to keep the former president in power, even after the defeat in the 2022 elections. To detail what the witnesses said, Natuza Nery receives Flávia Maia, judiciary analyst at the Jota platform. She, who closely followed all the testimonies, highlights what former Air Force commander Carlos Almeida Baptista Júnior and former Army chief Freire Gomes said. She tells the behind-the-scenes of the testimonies and Jair Bolsonaro's reactions to hearing the defense and prosecution witnesses. Afterwards, to understand how the witnesses' statements may implicate the former president and the other defendants, the guest is Gustavo Sampaio. Professor of Constitutional Law at the Federal Fluminense University, he also explains the next steps in the process.

Sentenced to 10 years in prison by the STF last month, federal deputy Carla Zambelli (PL-SP) announced on Tuesday (3rd) that she is out of the country. Without informing her whereabouts, Zambelli said she will request a leave of absence from her mandate as a deputy to be based in Europe. The Attorney General's Office requested Zambelli's pre-trial detention, in addition to including her name on Interpol's wanted list. Zambelli's flight from Brazil was first reported by journalists Andréia Sadi and Octávio Guedes. During Tuesday, in an interview with a radio station, Zambelli justified the evasion. She cited medical treatment, and went further: she alleged political motives and spoke of "persecution". In a conversation with Natuza Nery in this episode, the g1 reporter Reynaldo Turollo Jr. recalls the evidence against Carla Zambelli in the process in which she was convicted of participating in the invasion of the National Council of Justice's system and forging documents. He explains why Zambelli's passport was not withheld and what the legal implications of her departure from the country are. Later, Natuza receives journalist Bernardo Mello Franco. Columnist for the newspaper O Globo and commentator for CBN radio, Bernardo outlines the political consequences of the Bolsonaro deputy's flight from Brazil. And he concludes that her departure serves as a warning to the Supreme Federal Court on the eve of the trial of those accused of the attempted coup.

It was 18 months of preparation. Ukraine launched, over the weekend, an unprecedented attack on Russian military bases in 5 different regions. With 117 remotely triggered drones, Russian warplanes were hit. The surprising thing: the drones were camouflaged in trucks parked on Russian soil, strategically positioned near the targets. And even more surprising: the drones cost only US$500 each, and caused a loss of US$7 billion, according to the Ukrainian government. Everything was done on the eve of a meeting that sought a ceasefire between the governments of Moscow and Kiev. This Monday (2nd), authorities from both countries sat down to negotiate in Istanbul, Turkey. The two countries agreed to exchange prisoners and bodies of 6,000 soldiers on each side, but did not advance on a concrete and lasting truce. To explain the status of the conflict after more than three years of war and the moment of the negotiations, Natuza Nery talks to Feliciano de Sá Guimarães, professor at the Institute of International Relations at USP. He analyzes Ukraine's strategies, one of the world's leading drone manufacturers at the moment. For Feliciano, the attack "was hardly done without US intelligence". The professor also explains what is needed for the two countries to reach a prolonged peace agreement.

Today, over 39 million people have formal employment contracts in the country. But a movement has drawn attention: young people's aversion to formal employment contracts. The discourse of those who reject the CLT (Labor Law Consolidation) includes the view that, without employment ties, there is more schedule flexibility, freeing the worker from long commutes in crowded transport and bosses' scolding. The dream, sold on social media, is that it is possible to undertake and have easy success on the internet. Some even succeed, but most, if they could, would return to the formal market – as pointed out by a survey conducted by FGV in 2024. Created in 1943, the CLT regulates the relations between employee and employer. A CLT contract guarantees paid vacation, 13th salary, severance fund (FGTS), paid leave, unemployment insurance in case of dismissal, and other labor rights. In this episode, Natuza Nery talks with Carolline Leite, director and screenwriter of the series "Viração - new entrepreneurs," which premieres on GloboNews this Monday (2). Carolline tells what she heard from workers who chose to leave formal employment contracts aside. She reports how time management and salary are at the center of this discussion. Then, Natuza talks with Wagner Guilherme Alves da Silva. A researcher at the DeepLab of the University of Dublin, in Ireland, he explains how the rejection of the CLT by some workers has grown over the years. The anthropologist also answers what people are giving up - voluntarily or not - by rejecting the CLT.